Ambessa counters, patch 16.14
2,570 games of Ambessa top recorded on patch 16.14. 19 opponents cleared the 50 game pair floor; 103 more sit under it.
Patch 16.14 · Ambessa top
Gangplank is the hardest measured opponent for Ambessa top, and Dr. Mundo is the easiest.
Against Gangplank, Ambessa sits at -4.5 wins per 100 games (range -10.3 to 1.3) 78 games Pooled .
Against Dr. Mundo: +1.3 wins per 100 games (range -4.7 to 7.1) 74 games Pooled .
No pair separates cleanly against Ambessa yet: every measured range covers zero, so read the ranges before the ranking.
Who beats Ambessa?
Edge in wins per 100 games from Ambessa's side, the 8 hardest first. The bar under each figure draws that row's own 95% range on one scale, from 10.3 wins per 100 games below an even matchup on the left to 9.3 above it on the right. The tick is our estimate, the short line is zero, and a hatched bar is one whose range covers zero or spans most of the scale: those games do not pin the pair down.
Every measured Ambessa top matchup
19 opponents, hardest first. The table scrolls sideways inside this card on a narrow screen.
| # | opponent | games | edge for Ambessa | vs Ambessa's average | verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 78 | -4.5 (range -10.3 to 1.3) 78 games | too close | |
| 2 | | 61 | -3.9 (range -9.9 to 2.2) 61 games | too close | |
| 3 | | 51 | -3.6 (range -9.7 to 2.6) 51 games | too close | |
| 4 | | 68 | -3.6 (range -9.5 to 2.4) 68 games | too close | |
| 5 | | 57 | -3.1 (range -9.2 to 3.0) 57 games | too close | |
| 6 | | 180 | -3.0 (range -8.0 to 2.0) 180 games | too close | |
| 7 | | 67 | -2.6 (range -8.6 to 3.3) 67 games | too close | |
| 8 | | 65 | -1.9 (range -7.9 to 4.1) 65 games | too close | |
| 9 | | 73 | -1.9 (range -7.8 to 4.1) 73 games | too close | |
| 10 | | 85 | -1.8 (range -7.6 to 4.0) 85 games | too close | |
| 11 | | 63 | -1.6 (range -7.6 to 4.5) 63 games | too close | |
| 12 | | 74 | -0.9 (range -6.8 to 5.0) 74 games | too close | |
| 13 | | 90 | -0.9 (range -6.6 to 4.9) 90 games | too close | |
| 14 | | 58 | -0.6 (range -6.7 to 5.5) 58 games | too close | |
| 15 | | 84 | -0.2 (range -6.0 to 5.6) 84 games | too close | |
| 16 | | 51 | 0.0 (range -6.2 to 6.1) 51 games | too close | |
| 17 | | 60 | +0.2 (range -5.9 to 6.2) 60 games | too close | |
| 18 | | 54 | +0.6 (range -5.6 to 6.7) 54 games | too close | |
| 19 | | 74 | +1.3 (range -4.7 to 7.1) 74 games | too close |
103 more opponents, with 1,177 games between them, sit under the pair floor: counted, not listed.
How Ambessa's own games read
The baseline every pair above is measured against.
Ambessa won 1,239 of 2,570 games recorded in top on patch 16.14. As an estimate: 48.2% (range 46.3-50.1) 2,570 games Measured .
What edge and delta each answer
Edge answers who wins the pair: the shrunk win rate in those games minus 50. Delta answers whether the pair is unusual for Ambessa: the same rate minus Ambessa's own average. A champion that wins a lot can hold a positive edge in a pair that is still its worst matchup, which is what the delta column is for.
Ambessa needed 1,000 recorded top games before this page existed at all. Every floor and constant is on the methodology pages.
These numbers come from 108,616 ranked games we recorded on EUW, Korea and NA, found by following Diamond players and the people they play with. That is not every rank and it is not every region. Everything on this page is patch 16.14. Counted up to .
ko.lol for desktop
Your champion pool, your matchups and your patch notes, on your desktop while you play.
Free. For Windows.